8,976 Free Grateful Dead Concert Recordings at The Internet Archive

http://archive.org/details/GratefulDead

‘Gangnam Style’ is Most-Watched YouTube Clip of All Time

(Reprinted from MSN Entertainment)

Billboard

PSY’s “Gangnam Style” is now the most-watched  YouTube video of all time. The 4:13 clip from the South Korean rapper has earned  approximately 803,761,000 views since it was posted on July 15.

Early on Saturday, that total passed the longtime YouTube champ — the music  video for Justin Bieber’s “Baby,” which has garnered 803,732,000 views since its  February 2010 release.

“Gangnam Style” already set YouTube’s record for the Most Liked video ever  posted to the site, with its total now standing at 5.3 million Likes and 323,000  Dislikes. Bieber’s “Baby” clip has 1.4 million Likes and 3.1 million Dislikes.  Bieber’s “Baby” clip enjoyed an impressive run at the top of the YouTube heap,  becoming the most-watched video on the site in July 2010. At that time, the clip  had collected more than 246 million views to leapfrog over Lady Gaga’s “Bad  Romance.”

“#GangnamStyle just became the most watched video @YouTube!! #History,” PSY  posted to Twitter on Saturday morning in celebration of the  achievement.

10cc Interview: It Was a Tragedy We Didn’t Stay Together

10cc in 1975

10cc at the height of their fame, in 1976 (left to right): Graham Gouldman, Eric Stewart, Lol Creme, Kevin Godley. Photograph: Erica Echenberg/Redferns

(Reprinted from The Guardian)

They made some of the cleverest and most inventive music of the 70s, but split up at the height of their success. 10cc come together for the first time in 36 years to explain where it went wrong

by Paul Lester

Forget the Stone Roses’ comeback and the mooted (and denied) Smiths reunion: another great Manchester band has reunited. True, it is solely for the purpose of being interviewed by the Guardian. But it is the first time all four members of 10cc have spoken to the same publication, for the same article, since their split in 1976.

The reason they have “reconvened” is to discuss Tenology, a five-CD box set focusing on the pioneering pop music they made between 1972 and 1976, when their fast-paced, action-packed hits made them one of the biggest bands in Britain.

“Yes, in a way we’re back together,” says Graham Gouldman. “Only we’re in a box, not a studio. Help!”

With Tenology, 10cc should finally get their due as the Fab Four of the 70s. Songs such as Donna, Rubber Bullets and The Dean and I were melodically ingenious, sonically inventive, radical yet hugely commercial, crammed with ideas and hooks. As for the four albums the original foursome made together, from 1973’s self-titled debut to 1976’s How Dare You!, they posit 10cc as the missing art-pop link between the Beatles of the White Album and the Blur of Parklife.

“We took on the mantle of the Beatles,” agrees Eric Stewart, nominally 10cc’s guitarist even if, like all the members, he handled other instruments and sang. He also functioned as the band’s own in-house George Martin, largely producing and engineering their records, albeit with help from the others. “We experimented on every song – you’ll never hear two that sound alike.”

Ensconced at their Strawberry Studios in Stockport, 10cc – Gouldman, Stewart, Kevin Godley and Lol Creme – didn’t just include four singers and musicians who dabbled with the recording console. They also all wrote together, in various permutations, which probably explains the super-diverse nature of the material: a Gouldman-Stewart composition would differ wildly from a Godley-Creme one, while a Godley-Stewart or Creme-Gouldman track would take another tack entirely.

“I’d forgotten how avant-garde some of our music was,” says Godley, the drummer and singer whose ethereal falsetto was used to striking effect, despite him being the only member not to sing on a 10cc No 1 – that’s Stewart on I’m Not in Love and Creme on Rubber Bullets, while the basso profondo on Dreadlock Holiday is Gouldman’s.

Godley is perhaps thinking of Une Nuit a Paris, the nine-minute, three-part mini-opera that opens 1975’s The Original Soundtrack, and inspired Queen to make Bohemian Rhapsody. “One magazine recently described it as ‘an overreach’,” he says, “but we were constantly testing the waters of what we could and couldn’t do.”

Gouldman (bass, guitar, mandolin, autoharp) is annoyed by the pigeonholing of 10cc as a “guilty pleasure” when their so-called “soft rock” was artfully jagged: imagine what Frank Zappa might have achieved had he assembled a pop group in Manchester. They were the kid brothers of invention.

“People would ask: ‘What sort of music is it?’ But it’s not prog, it’s not art rock – it’s 10cc music,” Gouldman says. He brings up the song Clockwork Creep from 1974’s Sheet Music: “Who else would write a song about a bomb on an airplane – from the position of the bomb?”

For all the rapier satire and hyper-kinetic approach to songcraft, 10cc became hugely popular. Creme (guitar, keyboards), who grew up wanting to be a comic artist and brought that cartoon vision to bear on the music, was stunned by the scale of their success. “In those days, records sold in their thousands,” he says of 10cc’s many chart forays. “You needed to sell 40,000 to 50,000 a week to get in the top 10. I used to try to imagine thousands of people going out of their homes or work, into a record shop, to buy our track. It used to boggle my mind.”

It was Creme who, after lending his comically high falsetto to Donna, The Dean and I and Rubber Bullets, came closest to being 10cc’s frontman, at least in the early days. But then, 10cc had three other frontmen, what with Godley’s more austere charisma – not forgetting Stewart, who had sung on two worldwide No 1s in the 60s with the Mindbenders, and Gouldman who had written hits for the Yardbirds, Herman’s Hermits and the Hollies. Any one of them could have legitimately claimed the spotlight for themselves.

But there was hardly a rush to do that because in another sense they were all backroom boys – just before forming 10cc, they had been the session band for Neil Sedaka on his two “comeback” albums of the early 70s. They never intended to be pop stars, nor did they have much rock’n’roll in them – apart, Gouldman says, from the odd bit of creative vandalism when Godley and Creme, art-school graduates both, would doodle on paintings in hotel lobbies or lifts.

Rather, they were happiest in the studio, endlessly finessing their complex four-minute creations – the “professional wing” of Stewart and Gouldman would do their thing, and Godley and Creme would work their magic while stoned on lethal grass – what Stewart calls “their Benson & Hedges mindfuckers”.

“Eric had already been a fully fledged pop star, but he wanted to get into production,” Creme says. “We liked being backroom boys at Strawberry. I was horrified when we had to play live.”

Really, 10cc were less rock stars than part of a Brill Building or Hollywood tunesmith tradition. “We weren’t Zeppelin,” Creme admits. “We were pop, albeit an extreme version. That’s because we had four pretty odd minds. All sorts of things can happen when you’re free and easy with ideas and encouraged by the other lunatics around you.”

10cc peaked in the summer of 1975 with a supremely evocative piece of sustained mood music – all six minutes and 12 seconds of it – with a revolutionary soundbed of multitracked vocals and an ambiguous lyric that painted a sombre picture of young love. I’m Not in Love was a production milestone, one that has since won acclaim from Paul McCartney and Axl Rose, as well as 8m radio plays around the world. It also suggested the cerebral 10cc did have beating hearts.

Within a year, though, Godley and Creme had quit, to work on a guitar-based contraption called “the gizmo” and a triple album featuring comedian Peter Cook and jazz legend Sarah Vaughan, entitled Consequences. The bifurcation of 10cc revealed much about their component parts. By 1981 Godley and Creme’s music had more in common with the brainiac funk of Talking Heads, and within a couple of years they had become video pioneers, directing promos for Frankie Goes to Hollywood and Peter Gabriel. Meanwhile, the smoother pop axis of Gouldman-Stewart continued as 10cc, enjoying considerable success with Deceptive Bends (1977) and Bloody Tourists (1978), although by the early 80s Stewart had lost an eye in a car crash and the music had lost much of its edge.

All agree they should have been adult enough to accommodate Godley and Creme’s extracurricular activities and welcomed them back as and when they were ready to record as 10cc. But that didn’t happen, and although Godley and Gouldman remain friends and Creme and Stewart keep in touch (they are brothers-in-law), Godley and Creme’s partnership dissolved after 27 years in the late 80s and Stewart and Gouldman’s relationship broke down soon after that.

A full-scale reunion, then, seems unlikely. And yet not reforming is more in keeping with 10cc’s original spirit of adventurism and risk-taking.

“I remember seeing a programme on VH1 that brought dead bands back to life, and it was toe-curlingly embarrassing,” says Godley. “If I didn’t see a future, creatively, then I might be one of those people who dream about the past, but I’m not. It was fantastic for its time, but I have no delusions about recreating it.” Consequently, he’s now working on a music-sharing app.

Today, Creme (the only survivor of the 60s “beat boom” to become a member of a sampling/techno band, as he did when he joined Art of Noise in 1998) is in the Producers with Trevor Horn, Gouldman still tours as 10cc, and Stewart – arguably the one most affected by the fall-outs – makes music from his home studio in France.

They agree it was their lack of a coherent image that has meant 10cc have been replaced by Queen as representatives of 70s rock’s giddily inventive wing. As Godley puts it: “We only had 50% of what’s required for a successful cultural moment. We had The Noise, not The Look.” Not that there are any hard feelings about Queen having picked up their baton. “I’d like to ram the baton up their backside,” says Gouldman with some relish. He’s joking, of course, but he is more serious when he says: “It’s a tragedy that we didn’t stay together. It was a flame that burned incredibly brightly, but we could have lasted so much longer.” He allows himself a chuckle. “If you’ll forgive the expression, we had quite long candles.”

____________________

Here’s a little bonus audio clip: a fascinating look into the making of the band’s pop masterwork “I’m Not in Love”

Alice’s Restaurant Massacre

The full version of Arlo Guthrie’s 1967 counterculture classic, which took up all of side one of the album of the same name. The events, people, and restaurant were real.

Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots–The Musical

"Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots.

(Reprinted from the Los Angeles Times)

Review: ‘Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots’ sounds thrilling, at least

The Flaming Lips-inspired score is the highlight of the literary-challenged ‘Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots’ at La Jolla Playhouse.

By Charles McNulty, Los Angeles Times Theater Critic

LA JOLLA — Futuristic theatrical effects are deployed like a hypnotist’s pocket watch in “Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots.” But the real mesmerizing aspect of this new musical at La Jolla Playhouse, inspired by the music of the psychedelic rock band the Flaming Lips, is the way it sounds.

Our ears are delighted at a higher level than our eyes — or our minds, for that matter. The show’s sophistication lies in the floating lyricism of its score, which can be categorized in that Tower Records-era indie catch-all known as “alternative rock.” The visual imagination is seductive, but in a manner that can seem shallow for a work chronicling in surreal fashion a young woman’s desperate fight against cancer.

You either go along with the premise — a Japanese American artist’s battle with lymphoma is transformed into a war against flying robots — or you balk at its New Age underpinnings. Count me in the second category, though the ride through a night sky swarming with alien creatures is often exhilarating.

Inspired by the music of the Flaming Lips, the show incorporates songs from several albums, including of course the critically acclaimed “Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots.” The sublime orchestrations are by music director Ron Melrose, who frequently collaborates with Des McAnuff, the show’s director and probably the most knowledgeable theater artist on the planet when it comes to bringing concept albums to the stage.

McAnuff, who shaped the story with the Flaming Lips’ Wayne Coyne, seems to enjoy the freedom of working in that space between music video and book musical. The electric fluidity that he brought to his recent revival of “Jesus Christ Superstar” and his landmark production of “The Who’s Tommy” is certainly on full multimedia display here. And back at his old haunt, where he’s director emeritus (his unstoppable production of “Jersey Boys” surely sealed his Playhouse legacy), McAnuff seems intent on dazzling us with glitzy galactic spectacle.

The scenic imagery, a combination of Japanese anime and a loopier version of “Star Wars,” is relentless. The design team — which includes Robert Brill (scenic design), Basil Twist (puppetry), Sean Nieuwenhuis (video and projections), Paul Tazewell (costumes), Michael Walton ( lighting) and Steve Canyon Kennedy (sound) — has fashioned an extraordinary kaleidoscope, dominated by a cast of actor-controlled robots, including one 14-foot baby that looms over the action like a giant killer. And a group of ace musicians, conducted by Jasper Grant, one of the keyboardists, sets it all in motion to a lush, full sound.

But the awkward narrative tension between the seriousness of the subject matter and the fanciful way the allegory is realized never goes away.

A hipster painter with a penchant for white canvases featuring a blob of yellow, Yoshimi (Kimiko Glenn) is healthy when we first meet her. She’s in a relationship with Booker (Nik Walker), an investment broker, and trying her best to keep her computer graphics designer ex-boyfriend, the romantically dogged Ben (Paul Nolan), at bay.

Then, out of nowhere, Yoshimi collapses. Booker launches into “Mr. Ambulance Driver” from the Flaming Lips’ album “At War With the Mystics.” And her hospital nightmare, which gets visually transmogrified into a three-dimensional video game (complete with Bradley Rapier’s hallucinatory choreography) begins.

Doctor Petersen (the capable Tom Hewitt in a thankless role) informs her that her body is attacking itself with mutant lymphocytes: “These pink cells are the enemy. They must be defeated.”

What results can be described as a chemotherapy fantasia. Ben sums it up for us in “Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots Part I”: “Those evil-natured robots/They’re programmed to destroy us/She’s gotta be strong to fight them/So she’s taking lots of vitamins.”

The spoken vocabulary isn’t always this basic. There are words in “Pink Robots” you wouldn’t normally expect to hear in a musical — words that would stop even Stephen Sondheim dead in his tracks. “Immunotherapy,” “synthetic antibodies” and the names of medical procedures I’m too much of a hypochondriac to repeat contribute to the show’s odd blend of space-age fantasy and clinical realism.

La Jolla Playhouse is getting a reputation for developing musicals that don’t act like musicals. Earlier this year “Hands on a Hardbody,” a show about a contest for a pickup truck at a Texas auto dealership, had its premiere here and is now headed to Broadway despite the choreographically challenging fact that the characters must maintain one hand on the vehicle to win it.

Thinking in an untraditional way is precisely what’s needed at a time when the American musical has reverted to cheesy movie adaptations and jejune jukebox contraptions. But the literary sensibility behind “Pink Robots” is markedly inferior to its visual imagination. This show needs a book writer, STAT.

The basic outline of the story is clear enough, but the details can be fuzzy or cramped or, in the case of Yoshimi’s parents (played by John Haggerty and Pearl Sun), stereotypical. The romantic turmoil is treated in the imagistic shorthand of a Madonna video. And then there are lines (“You know, there is evidence that love actually has the ability to heal”) that had me flipping through the program to see if inspirational author Louise L. Hay had a hand in the work’s creation. (It’s not the sentiment so much as the banality of expression.)

Nolan, who was Jesus in McAnuff’s production of “Jesus Christ Superstar,” anchors the show with a bohemian clownishness that contains a searching lyricism. Glenn is exquisite to look at and listen to, though Yoshimi is treated too picturesquely, like a suffering doll. Walker brings sympathy to a character who can’t bear to witness what he’s helpless to change.

It’s the singing of these performers, rather than their acting, that stirs up the emotions — just as it’s the haunting sound of the show, rather than its dazzling sights, that has stayed with me. If you want to go to a deeper place with “Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots,” you’ll have to close your eyes and travel there via your own imagination.

Kimiko Glenn in "Yoshimi Battles The Pink Robots"

A History Of Short-Lived Band Reunions

  

(Reprinted from Rolling Stone)

Not all band reunions last – Here’s a look at some that seemed to be over before  they began

By Andy Greene

Earlier this month, Neil Young confirmed widespread suspicion that last year’s Buffalo Springfield reunion was over after a mere seven-show tour. “I have to be able to  move forward,” he said.  “I can’t be relegated. I did enough of it for right then.” But they aren’t the first band to reform with great fanfare, only to collapse again pretty quickly. Here’s a look at some others.

Led Zeppelin

Break-Up: 1980. The group dissolved immediately after the death of drummer Jon Bonham.

Reunion: The surviving members reformed for the rare special  occasion in the 1980s and 1990s, but in December of 2007 they did their first  full concert since the break-up at London’s 02 Arena.

Duration: One night. Jimmy Page and John Paul Jones were  extremely interested in a reunion, but Robert Plant had absolutely no interest.  In 2008 the group rehearsed with Steven Tyler and Myler Kennedy and even began  putting venues on hold for a tour, but ultimately came to their  senses.

Journey with Steve Perry

Break-Up: The group dissolved after their tour in support of  1986’s Raised On Radio. Frontman Steve Perry was exhausted and wanted  to take a long break.

Reunion: They played a couple of songs in 1991 at a Bill  Graham memorial show, but Perry shocked the band in 1996 when he agreed to  reform the group. They recorded the new album Trial By Fire and a  reunion tour was in the works. Their single “When You Love A Woman” even became  a big hit.

Duration: One album. Perry injured his hip while hiking  in Hawaii and required hip replacement surgery. He refused to set a date for the  procedure, delaying any shows. This caused tremendous tension within the band,  and in 1998 they hit the road with a replacement singer. Perry hasn’t sung a  note in public with Journey in over twenty years.

The Fugees

Break-Up: The Fugees spent five years struggling to  break big, only to implode almost immediately after becoming superstars. Looking  back, it was pretty inevitable. Wyclef Jean was dating Lauryn Hill, but he was  also seriously involved with another woman while they were together. At the same  time, Hill felt that she wasn’t getting enough credit for her contributions to  the band. Pras felt the same way. They split in 1997, about a year after The  Score hit shelves.

Reunion: Much to the surprise of pretty much everybody,  the group reformed in September 2004 to play Dave Chapelle’s Block Party in  Brooklyn. The following year they launched a European tour, and even released  the new single “Take It Easy.”

Duration: A little over a year, with large gaps of  inactivity within that. Everyone hated the new single, and Lauryn caused  tremendous tension by pulling an Axl on the tour and repeatedly coming out late.  To the surprise of nobody, they pulled the plug in early 2006.

  

Van Halen (With Sammy Hagar)

Break-Up: Believe it or not, tension surrounding the  soundtrack to Twister caused Sammy Hagar to leave Van Halen in 1995.  The group had just finished a long world tour, and a worn out Hagar was  unwilling to fly right back to the studio and continue work on a song for the  disaster movie. When all was said and done, Hagar left the band.

Reunion: An ill-fated LP and tour with Gary Cherone  convinced the Van Halen brothers that they needed their old singer back. Both  sides had talked a lot of shit over the years, but they put that aside to record  some new songs for a compilation and launch a tour in 2004.

Duration: A little under a year. The tour coincided  with the peak of Eddie Van Halen’s alcoholism. Hagar and Eddie had  horrific clashes on tour (detailed in Sammy Hagar’s amazing autobiography) and  neither party has spoken with each otter since the final show in November of  2004. That’s also the last time Eddie spoke with original bassist Michael  Anthony.

Electric Light Orchestra

Break-Up: In the summer of 1986, the group (now reduced to a  trio) toured in support of their new disc Balance of Power, and then  called it a day. Members of the group carried on in ELO Part II, but the group’s  leader Jeff Lynne was done. (Even later, The Orchestra rose from the ashes of  ELO Part II, but they were an offshoot of an offshoot and barely worth  mentioning.)

Reunion: Lynne always saw himself as the Trent Reznor of  ELO, and when he reformed the group in 2000 for the new album Zoom he  didn’t invite any of the original guys back – though keyboardist Richard Tandy  did wind up playing on one song. For some reason, Lynne was under the impression  the group could still fill arenas and a massive tour was announced.

Duration: One album and one TV concert. This was like  one of those 1950s rockets that crashed a few moments after takeoff. The group  did a single show for PBS, but the tour sold horribly and the entire thing was  called off before it even started. Lynne’s done a pretty good job of staying out  of the spotlight ever since, though he remains a busy producer.

The Supremes

Break-Up: Diana Ross left The Supremes in 1970, but  they carried on with new singer Jean Terrell and continued to score hits  and tour for a few years. By 1977 things had slowed down considerably and they  called it quits.

Reunion: Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong briefly put  aside their differences with Diana Ross at the 1983 Motown 25th Anniversary  Concert. (Founding member Florence Ballard died in 1976.) They performed  “Someday We’ll Be Together.” Three years later, Wilson released her memoir and  it was sharply critical of Ross, driving the two even further apart. In 1999  Ross reached out to Wilson and Birdsong about a reunion tour for the following  year, exactly 30 years after they had last played a full show together.

Duration: This one went really, really poorly.  According to multiple reports, Ross was offered around $15 million, Wilson was  offered $2 million and Birdsong $1 million. They asked for more, but were  ultimately replaced by two latter-day Supremes who had no history with Ross.  This resulted in a flood of negative press, and ticket buyers seemed to have  little interest in this “reunion.” The tour forged ahead, but was canceled after  less than a month.

Cream

Break-Up: Cream crammed a lot of music into their two-year  career. According to legend, Eric Clapton decided to break up in the band in  1968 when he first heard the Band’s debut LP Music From Big Pink, and  when he read a scathing review of the group’s music in Rolling Stone by  Jon Landau. In November of 1968 they played a farewell show at Madison Square  Garden.

Reunion: The group played in 1993 at their induction into  the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, but that didn’t lead to any other activity until  2005. At the time Jack Bruce was recovering from liver cancer, and Ginger Baker  was struggling with arthritis.  To Clapton, it seemed like it was  now or never. They played four shows at the Royal Albert Hall in May of 2005,  followed by three shows at Madison Square Garden that October.

Duration: Five months. The reunion fizzled out during  the three-night stand in New York. “In many ways, I wish we had left it at the  Royal Albert Hall,” Clapton wrote in his memoir. “But the offer was too good to  refuse … My heart had gone out of it, and also a certain amount of animosity  had crept back in.” They haven’t played together since.

Genesis

Break-Up: In 1997 Genesis made the ill-fated decision to  carry on without Phil Collins. Former Stiltskin singer Ray Wilson was brought  into the band, and they released the new LP Calling All Stations. The  disc sold extremely poorly, as did their tour. Ticket sales were so bad in  America that the entire tour was called off. The tour ended in May of 1998 in  Germany, and the group quietly ended afterwards.

Reunion: In November of 2005 Phil Collins came to Glasgow on  his First Final Farewell tour. Backstage he met up with his former bandmates  Peter Gabriel, Steve Hackett, Tony Banks and Mike Rutherford to discuss a  reunion tour. The plan was to perform their 1975 rock opera The Lamb Lies  Down On Broadway straight through. Gabriel only wanted to do a tiny number  of dates, and when he felt pressure to commit to a longer tour he bowed out of  the whole thing. With him out of the picture, the 1980s line-up of Collins,  Banks and Rutherford decided to tour instead. In 2007 they did 47 dates across  Europe and North America.

Duration: Four months. The tour ended at the Hollywood Bowl  in October of 2007. On the tour Collins dislocated some vertebrae  in his  neck. It caused nerve damage in his hands, making it nearly impossible for him  to play drums. Collins is now completely retired from music, and any sort of  Genesis reunion seems incredibly unlikely.

Previous Older Entries Next Newer Entries