Man in Chicken Suit Plays Haddaway’s “What is Love”

Richard Marx Hates My Guts

marx

(reprinted from Salon)

I made a snarky comment about the 1980s soft-rock balladeer on my blog. And now he won’t leave me alone. Really.

By Edward McClelland

Don’t talk trash about Richard Marx in his hometown.

As I wrote in a story last week on the Morning News, Marx – the Chicago-born singer best known for the 1980s soft-rock hits “Hold On to the Nights” and “Right Here Waiting” – demanded a sit-down with me after I called him “shameless” in a blog post for a local TV station’s news site.

“Would you say that to my face?” he emailed me. “Let’s find out. I’ll meet you anywhere in the city, any time. I don’t travel again until the end of the week. Let’s hash this out like men.”

At first, I thought a reader was pulling my leg. Then Marx sent these tweets from his verified account: “You call me ‘shameless’ in print in my home town but won’t respond to my emails to define/explain. I call #chickenshit.” That was followed by “Hey @TedMcClelland I’m running some errands. Should I stop and pick you up some tampons?”

So I invited Marx to my neighborhood bar. He arrived in his Jaguar.

“Listen,” I told him, “if anything I wrote offended you personally, I apologize. It was meant to be music criticism, and I don’t think any reasonable reader would have taken it otherwise. I didn’t intend to impugn your character.”

He still seemed miffed.

“You called me shameless in my hometown, where my family can read this,” he said.

At the time, I thought I was special. Marx told me that, despite 25 years of snarky reviews, he had never met face-to-face with a writer who’d gotten on his bad side. I could not understand why an internationally famous musician who’s sold 30 million records – albeit one whose last hit was nearly two decades ago – would be so overwrought over something I wrote on a pissant blog that he’d drive an hour from his suburban estate to a strange bar in a strange neighborhood just to dress me down in person.

But as I’ve since learned, Marx has a long history of getting heavy with local journalists. After a blogger for Chicagoist called him “the Midwest’s answer to Billy Joel,” Marx responded with a series of testy emails. The blogger, who also belonged to a comedy troupe, reenacted the exchange with a friend who donned a Tina Turner wig to play the formerly mulleted singer. Just last month, Marx failed to show up for an appearance on the public radio station, because, he said, it was raining, he had bronchitis and he couldn’t find parking. When the host complained that Marx had made it to a TV show the same day, the singer took to Twitter.

“So some guy … is bashing me on the radio for not walking in pouring rain with bronchitis to do his show?” he wrote. “Pussy move.”

It escalated from there, with Marx calling the host and his producer “coward,” “douchebag” and “jerk.”

As a poster on Metafilter pointed out after I published my story, Marx consistently violates the public relations maxim “never punch down.”

“If you’re going to feud with a nobody, make sure you’re doing it because you want to help their career,” the poster wrote. “Marx looks like a fool here, and the writer gets bragging rights about how he met Marx in a bar and didn’t back down from calling him shameless, which is a characterization of Marx that few would object to.”

According to the Recording Industry Association of America, Marx’s quadruple-platinum album “Repeat Offender” has sold more copies than “Blonde on Blonde,” “Songs for Swingin’ Lovers” or “Pet Sounds.” (In fact, Marx’s most popular album has sold more copies than any album by Bob Dylan, Frank Sinatra or the Beach Boys.) However, Marx’s window of fame was so brief, and his songs so ephemeral, that he doesn’t have a musical legacy. He’s still heard on late-night call-in request shows for the lovelorn, and, as even he admits, “I’m HUUUUGE at Walgreens” as background music for shopping.

But unlike near-contemporary pop stars Hall & Oates and Journey, Marx has not built a following among a new generation of fans. Few people under the age of 30 or over the age of 60 knows who he is, and most people in between haven’t thought about him in decades. His last Top 10 hit, “Now and Forever,” was released in 1994. He’s a songwriter and a producer now, with a Grammy for co-writing Luther Vandross’ “Dance With My Father,” but in Hollywood, nobody knows the writer’s name.

Marx has never gotten respect from critics, which is understandably galling for any artist. In a 1990 concert review, a New York Times critic compared him to David Cassidy and Donny Osmond, as the latest in “a long string of insipid, pseudo-adolescent singing idols whose tenure as teenage heartthrobs rarely lasts more than three years.” That was also the last time Marx’s music was the subject of a New York Times article.

Nowadays, only Chicago critics bother to disrespect him. Down is the only direction he can punch, and he seems to believe that, as a native son and 30-times-over platinum artist, he deserves obeisance from not-quite-major-market hacks who are not his professional, financial or creative peers. Marx once threw a diva fit when he found out that songwriter David Foster had received twice as much airtime as he did on WGN-TV.

“A six minute segment. And 3 anchors,” Marx emailed producer Jeff Hoover. “So I sell over thirty million albums and write 13 number one songs … Oh, yeah … and I also produced Josh Groban. And Streisand. And many more. And you might let me squeeze out 3 minutes. And even that may involve you dancing like an idiot behind me. Next time you need someone to sing on your show … you should call David.”

It occurred to me, after my story was published, that Marx might be picking fights with writers as a way to keep himself in the public eye. Because his tweets and emails are so loaded with grievance and crass invective, a run-in with Richard Marx makes great copy. As that Metafilter poster predicted, I have never received as much attention for a piece of writing as I have for that yarn about my barroom encounter with a pop star. It even inspired a Tumblr site devoted to “mostly fictitious stories about people meeting Richard Marx.”

As the Facebook counter and my Twitter followers climbed into the thousands, and emails hit my in-box from England, Ireland and all corners of the USA, I wondered whether Marx had been playing me. But while I respect him for facing me down personally, rather than siccing a lawyer or a P.R. agent on me, which he certainly could have afforded to do, I cannot believe a man as rich and famous as Marx has anything to gain professionally from feuding with bloggers. For whatever reason – insecurity, bitterness, an exaggerated sense of honor — Marx has a bottomless need to vent against his critics.

Less than 24 hours after my article appeared, Marx – who had flown to Los Angeles that day – sent me a long email in which he attacked my looks, my marital status, my lack of professional achievement, my hypocrisy and my factual accuracy. He informed me that my arrogance is in league with Adolf Hitler’s and Joseph Stalin’s. (To be fair, I’d done some of the same to him, although I didn’t compare him to Hitler, Stalin or any other 20th-century dictator.)

He insisted I publish this letter in its entirety. I am doing so here, both because he dared me (“let’s see if you have the guts”), and because I want to give readers a glimpse inside the mind of a sensitive love balladeer. I’ve annotated the letter where a passage needs explaining, or where I feel like taking another dig at Marx. After all, as he points out, the only thing I’ve got over him is my own blog.

McClelland,

I’m still laughing at your tweet today suggesting I “let this go” when it was you, eight months after I had done just that….face to face…., who chose to print another public attack on my character, and in an extra douch-ey move, include my private e-mails to you. We’ll see if you have the guts to reprint this e-mail, unedited.

First, let’s cover the inaccuracies of your “piece” today.

First, your editor, who’s not named but whose identity I can easily find, is a liar. I’ve never tipped less than 20% in my adult life, and you’re more than invited to call any establishments you think I may patronize to check it out. Also, anytime you’d like to compare annual charity contributions, say when. (Oh,..and I’m also taller than my wife, but despite being 5′ 10″ I get pegged as much shorter all the time, perhaps due to a somewhat scrawny physique and alarmingly oversized head…but I digress.)

[I read this paragraph to the editor of my blog, who reiterated that not only is Marx a bad tipper, he’s what waitstaff call a “runner” – a demanding diner who constantly asks his server to run back to the kitchen for a new fork, a basket of rolls, etc. However, this photo of the Marxes with President Clinton indicates that Marx – or at least his hair – is taller than his wife.] 

clinton

Second, to assume you can crawl inside my head and know what my motivation is for writing a song is arrogance reserved for the likes of Hitler and Stalin. Opinion based on fact is respectable journalism. Opinion based on information you have no possibility of knowing is intentionally ignorant and shouldn’t be permitted to stand.

Third, my Christmas album was and is available everywhere, not just Target. iTunes, Amazon, Best Buy, trunk of my car, wherever. A nine second Google search would’ve told you that. And if you (and “Mike, the Plumber”) think making a Christmas album and wanting it to sell is shameless, you’re not only a blithering idiot, but a total hypocrite. I checked on Amazon and lo and behold, your Obama book is available there. So I’m a “sellout” for selling a Christmas album but you selling a book is, what?…a “calling?” A “service?” Did you donate all the royalties? I call bullshit.

[The Richard Marx Store at Richard Marx’s website, richardmarx.com, has a link to target.com, which advertises a special edition of “Christmas Spirit” with four bonus tracks, available “Only at Target.”]

Lastly, your statement “Richard Marx is married to a model” is not only inaccurate, but insulting to my wife of twenty-four years. Cynthia is a former professional dancer, and actress who has co-starred in more than one iconic film. More importantly, she’s a mother who raised three children and who does more volunteering for charity every single year than anyone I know. The demeaning tone of your statement is worthy of an ass-kicking unto itself.

[Marx is married to the former Cynthia Rhodes, who played Penny in “Dirty Dancing.”]

You are correct, despite your childish description of my appearance, that I have not had plastic surgery. You can check behind my ears for scars. Interestingly, while I think you’re a few years younger than me, you appear considerably older. While as insecure as the next person, I’ll choose my view in the mirror over yours any day of the week. But not just for what’s on the outside.

We all know guys just like you. You posture all day long about what a “rebel” you are or how “angry” you were to the pathetic point of protesting far too much. The truth is more likely that you spent more time in high school locked inside your own locker than in a classroom. And it shaped exactly who you are today.

The big question is why I give a shit about people like you or the things you write. Even my wife and some friends ask me why I don’t just let certain things go. I’m fully aware of what’s in my win column. Amazing human being for a wife; kind and healthy kids; more than one fiercely loyal friend; and a career that, after twenty-five years, still sees me hearing my songs on the radio, writing new songs with an array of diverse artists, and touring all over the world. So why do I let these certain attacks get to me?

Here’s my explanation. The internet, Twitter and blogs particularly, are a Utopian breeding ground for cowards. A place for small, frustrated people to spew vile, bitter shit without fearing true retribution. But don’t forget…Twitter, as well as your little blog, is a public forum. And in a world drowning a little more each day in apathy, I choose to occasionally call out the cowards, if only to briefly shine a big, bright light on their little yellow streak. Today, you became the poster-boy for Chickenshit-itis.

And for you, as well as anyone else who thinks this is as simple as me being “thin-skinned,” let me make a clear distinction, again…and for the last time: Mock or belittle my music all day long? Go for it. You’re entitled to your opinion. But disparage or call into question my character, and I’ll demand you answer for it. That’s what I think anyone with any self respect is obliged to do.

I’m fully aware of my lack of celebrity. You think that’s an insult? (Although what does it say about you that you would dedicate an entire blog about….ME?) I wasn’t EVER really a celebrity. But a bunch of my songs are. And going back to your ignorant and clueless statement about me trying to write songs strictly for commerce, I’ve only ever written songs that I liked, and hoped other people would like as well, and a couple of my biggest hits were written specifically for my wife, with no initial intention to record them. But I absolutely love that they became hugely popular songs all over the world that people dedicated to loved ones, sang at graduations, funerals, weddings. And I’m even more grateful to have had someone in my life to write those songs for, and about.

By your own admission, this is among the many things you are without.

But you’ve got your blog. Congrats to you.

Marx

_________________________

McClelland’s original blog post, which is a hilarious read, can be found here:

http://www.themorningnews.org/article/right-here-waiting

 

Ohio Slayers: Does “Love Rollercoaster” Contain a Murdered Woman’s Scream?

honey(Reprinted from Snopes,com)

Claim: The Ohio Players’ recording of the song “Love Rollercoaster” includes the scream of a murdered woman.

Status: False

Examples:

Collected on the internet, 1996:

The cover of the album Honey by the Ohio Players depicts a nude model kneeling atop what appears to be a sheet of glass, dripping honey all over herself from a ladle suspended above her head. The original UL was that the glass was actually Fiberglass (or some other synthetic), which reacted chemically with the honey, bonding her skin, like Superglue, to the Fiberglass. Freeing her ripped the skin off her legs, and her career as a model was ruined. Soooo…she just happens to burst into the recording studio while the Ohio Players are recording “Love Rollercoaster” and starts to threaten to sue the band for everything they’re worth. The band’s manager stabs her to death right there in the control booth, and that’s the scream you hear in the song.

Collected on the internet, 1996:

Remember the classic song “Love Rollercoaster” by the Ohio Players? Well the rumor going around the Passaic, NJ YWCA was that one of the screams in the song was that of a real woman being murdered. Apparently, the song was recorded in the band’s apartment, and a woman was being killed by an intruder.

Collected on the internet, 1996:

Someone brought up something to me yesterday regarding a 70’s song called “Rollercoaster”. I don’t remember a thing about the song, but I do remember my brother telling me (I was about eight or younger at the time), that a scream in the background of the song was recorded inadvertently, and was actually a cleaning woman screaming as she was stabbed during the recording of the song.

Variations:

  • The site of the murder varies: an apartment (adjacent to the one in which the band is recording), just outside the studio, in an adjacent studio, inside the control room, and within the studio itself.
  • The identity of the dead woman also varies: an unknown victim, a cleaning woman, the girlfriend of one of the group members, or the model who posed for the album cover.
  • Some versions of this legend claim that the scream is a real but pre-recorded one (taken from tapes of inmates undergoing shock therapy at a local institution or s 911 emergency call).

Origins: It’s a metaphor: love as a rollercoaster ride. Both involve their fair share of screaming, so when the Ohio Players recorded their 1975 hit, they naturally incorporated a real scream into the track. In the 1970’s you couldn’t just do something like that simply because it made sense, though, so it wasn’t long before wildly improbable stories about the origin of the scream began to circulate by word of mouth, aided by an army of disk jockeys eager to pass along a juicy (if apocryphal) anecdote.

The rumors that postulated the scream was a real one taken from an external source (a psychiatric hospital or 911 tape) were the most plausible ones. Other explanations had the band recording in an apartment building (where a woman was conveniently murdered next door), microphones picking up the scream from a violent crime committed outside the recording studio (so much for that “soundproof studio” idea), or a band member stabbing his girlfriend (or a cleaning woman) to death in the studio as the tape rolled (presumably hoping to be the first person to simultaneously hit #1 on both the Billboard singles chart and the FBI’s Most Wanted list).

The most outrageous rumor had to do with the cover of the album on which “Love Rollercoaster” appeared. Entitled Honey, the album’s daring (for its time) outer cover featured a nude Playboy model lapping honey from a jar with a clear plastic spoon, while the inner gatefold sleeve pictured her covered with the sticky golden liquid.

ohioAccording to legend, the model was horribly burned by the honey (because it was heated to make it flow more freely) or suffered excruciating pain when it was removed (because it was actually a form of liquid plastic that took huge chunks out of her skin with it when it was removed), and her screams of agony are what is heard on the finished product. (Apparently the Ohio Players were experimenting with rush record production techniques that had the recording of the album’s music occurring in the studio simultaneous with the creation of the album’s cover art.) A related version had the badly scarred model show up that the studio to demand compensation for her injuries just as the band was recording “Love Rollercoaster” and their manager deftly handled the situation by killing her on the spot.

In truth, the scream does seem a bit out of place: it’s a feminine voice amidst a group of male singers, it’s buried low in the mix, and it does sound like the cry of a woman in terror rather than that of a “thrilled-to-be-scared” amusement park customer. It’s not hard to imagine how easily people receptive to rumor could be convinced that this sound didn’t belong on the track, but had inadvertently slipped in.

The real source of the scream–and the origins of the rumor–were explained by Ohio Player Jimmy “Diamond” Williams:

“There is part of the song where there’s a breakdown. It’s guitars and it’s right before the second verse and Billy Beck does one of those inhaling-type screeches like Minnie Ripperton did to reach her high note or Mariah Carey does to go octaves above. The DJ made this crack and it swept the country. People were asking us, ‘Did you kill this chick in the studio?’ The band took a vow of silence because that makes you sell more records.”

The audio clip below contains the scream in question:

Top Ten Singles 40 Years Ago This Week

Week ending February 10, 1973

  1. Crocodile Rock-Elton John
  2. You’re So Vain-Carly Simon
  3. Why Can’t We Live Together-Timmy Thomas
  4. Oh Babe, What Would You Say?-Hurricane Smith
  5. Superstition-Stevie Wonder
  6. Do it Again-Steely Dan
  7. The World is a Ghetto-War
  8. Trouble Man-Marvin Gaye
  9. Don’t Expect Me to Be Your Friend-Lobo
  10. Could it Be I’m Falling in Love-Spinners

(Source: Billboard Hot 100)

Songs You May Have Missed #319

ambrosiaAmbrosia: “Lover Arrive” (1975)

Ambrosia was a much different band in 1975 than they’d become later in the decade, when they’d honed their sound into the blue-eyed soul exhibited on such singles as “How Much I Feel”, “Biggest Part of Me” and “You’re the Only Woman”.

Their self-titled debut was a sprawling, eclectic, progressive work that saw them trying anything and everything. It also had moments of sheer beauty like “Lover Arrive”, a gentle ballad about the longing for new love and a new beginning.

Songs You May Have Missed #318

shazam

The Shazam: “Squeeze the Day” (2002)

Nashville power pop band The Shazam is led by gifted guitarist/vocalist/songwriter Hans Rotenberry, whose stuff shows a love for classic melodic 70’s and 80’s rock, with a certain element of British-ness in the mix.

Unfortunately, the record sales have never been on the level of the critical acclaim for these guys. Their excellent Godspeed the Shazam and Tomorrow the World records had me waiting for the true classic album I believed they had in them.

With Rotenberry currently working on side projects, I’m wondering if that ship has now sailed.

Nevertheless, they carried the power pop torch as well as any band of their time.

See also: https://edcyphers.com/2012/02/11/songs-you-may-have-missed-10/

See also: https://edcyphers.com/2013/09/19/songs-you-may-have-missed-475/

Previous Older Entries Next Newer Entries