Scorpions NOT Retiring After All: Haven’t We Heard This Song Before?

scorpions

(Reprinted from Ultimate Classic Rock)

Three years after telling the world that they were taking their amplifiers and heading home, the members of Scorpions have reconsidered that whole retirement thing — in fact, it sounds like their upcoming schedule will keep them as busy as ever.

Singer Klaus Meine confirmed the news — which began to become obvious last summer — in an interview with Classic Rock Magazine, describing their change of heart as “a gradual decision” and explaining, “It’s one thing to say, ‘This is going to be the end of the Scorpions’ and another to do it.”

Going on to describe their 2010 release ‘Sting in the Tail’ album as “such a success that a whole new generation of fans joined the party,” Meine continued, “It was amazing. And you know that with all the best parties it’s sometimes hard to find the door?”

And although he wouldn’t get any more specific than that, saying “We’ll just have to see what’s realistic,” Meine did reveal that fans should be seeing as well as hearing more Scorpions: “We’re working on a documentary about the band’s history. We filmed the tour’s big finale, which was very emotional.”

____________________

Remember Ozzy Osbourne’s 1993 “No More Tours” retirement tour? It was followed about a year later by “The Retirement Sucks Tour”. Does the phrase “when hell freezes over” ring a bell?

Am I the only one who’s growing a little cynical about rock band “retirements”? I nearly went to see the Scorpions last year, as much because I thought it would be a last chance as any other reason. But I suppose these things are always going to be conditional: if they have enough fun on a “last” tour or someone throws enough money at them for another, the retirement becomes, in retrospect at least, kind of farce.

If you pay to see something advertised as a “retirement tour”, you’re not just paying to see a band you presumably like, but you’re also paying to see a bit of history–a famous band’s final tour. If they tour again they aren’t taking back your enjoyment in seeing the “farewell tour”–but they are taking back some of the significance of what you saw, and perhaps some of the reason you spent money on the ticket too. Am I the only one skeptical enough to think it possible that a band has, or someday will, artificially drive up ticket sales for a tour by simply calling it that last one they’ll do? (Not that rock stars aren’t completely straight-laced and honest or anything…)

Other than Glen Campbell’s recent Alzheimer’s-induced Goodbye Tour, I suppose the only “retirement tour” that can be fully trusted is the one that’s never announced as such–Bob Marley in 1980 or Lynyrd Skynyrd’s “Street Survivors” tour. Rock stars tend to be more like Brett Favre than Jim Brown when it comes to giving up the spotlight.

Songs You May Have Missed #286

chvrches

Chvrches: “The Mother We Share” (2012)

This Glasgow, Scotland band used the Roman “v” to make their band easier to search on the internet. A good idea, and too late for The Cars, Police, America, Heart, and many others.

They created enough of a stir in 2012 with just the release of two singles that numerous music sites have named them a band to watch for 2013, when they’ll be releasing their full-length debut album.

Songs You May Have Missed #285

seymour

Phil Seymour: “Baby it’s You” (1980)

Former Dwight Twilley Band member and Tom Petty session man Phil Seymour’s first solo record in 1980 produced one hit single–the #22 “Precious to Me”–and one non-single that was equally good, “Baby it’s You”.

From 1979 into the early 80’s we saw a brief streak of chart success for this particular strain of lean, uptempo power pop as Seymour, Twilley, Marshall Crenshaw, Nick Lowe, Shoes and The Knack all got a moment or two to shine before the synths took over.

By the mid-80’s Phil Seymour was diagnosed with lymphoma, and the disease took his life in 1993 while he was working on a new album.

Pop Music is in a Sickly State – But Could 2013 Bring a Great Revival?

(Excerpted from The Guardian)

by Dorian Lynskey

Last November, 265 journalists and fans boarded Rihanna’s jet for her week-long 777 jaunt, a hubristic and shambolic PR stunt to promote a mediocre record which used this once-interesting star’s reunion with former assailant Chris Brown as a tacky selling point. Rolling Stone’s reporter described passengers as “ignored, bored, hungry and annoyed” and concluded: “Never do something like this again.” If Buddy Holly’s fatal plane journey on 2 February 1959 was, according to Don McLean, the day the music died, then 777 was the week the music took a long hard look at itself.

The 777 tour felt symbolic of the current sickly condition of chart pop. The industry’s falling revenues have induced suffocating caution and cynicism as more and more eggs are stuffed into a few threadbare baskets. Most of the chart’s regular visitors are the same as they were two years ago. Producers such as David Guetta, Calvin Harris and will.i.am have presided over a ubiquitous lowest-common-denominator mulch of pop, hip-hop and dance music whose lyrical vision rarely extends below the club VIP room. The output of tireless Miami rapper Pitbull is so increasingly cretinous that each release makes its predecessor sound like River Deep Mountain High, and the Olympics closing ceremony suggested that if the answer is always Jessie J then you’re asking the wrong question. Like the benighted passengers on 777, chart pop sounds exhausted and nauseous. Even the usually upbeat Popjustice website recently  decided: “Pop needs a kick up the arse.”

There are three ways of assessing such a slump. One is the kneejerk anti-pop argument that the top 40 has always been terrible and always will be. Another is the declinist view that there was a halcyon era (which invariably coincides with the listener’s own youth) and we are doomed to live in its shadow. The third approach is that it is a point on a cycle: another fall before another rise before another fall, and so on.

Despite the depressing prevailing winds, change is definitely afoot. The largest bastions of tabloid values and tin-eared conservatism are vulnerable. The last two seasons of  X Factor have haemorrhaged viewers and Chris Moyles has ceded the Radio 1 breakfast show to the younger, sharper Nick Grimshaw, a DJ whose favourite sound is not his own voice. Meanwhile, some of the year’s biggest hits have been refreshing anomalies. A couple of years ago, nobody was banking on global success for a thirtysomething South Korean (PSY), a Belgian-Australian drummer called Wally (Gotye), and a drowsy starlet whose  music resembles a high-school musical based on the movies of David Lynch (Lana Del Rey).

People who disdain chart pop tend to assume that the average listener is a tasteless mug who will stomach any formulaic tat because they don’t know any better. The likes of Simon Cowell and Pitbull operate on that principle. But even the least discerning listeners get restless and hungry for something new. Give them a Somebody That I Used to Know or Video Games, a record that doesn’t follow the script, and they will often embrace it. Underestimate them and you might get away with it in the short-term, but eventually they’ll turn around and say: “Enough!”

At its very best the top 40 resembles a  massive house party with nobody guarding the door. The extroverts are on the dancefloor, the oddballs are in the kitchen and all manner of surprising couplings are taking place in the room where the coats are stored. The mingling of people who would otherwise never meet is what makes it interesting and relevant. Of late, the party has taken on a desperate 5am feel. Pitbull is spraying himself with champagne, Calvin Harris hogs the stereo, Britney wanders around looking sad and lost, Jessie J is everywhere, and all the oddballs have gone home because nobody was talking to them. But there are some intriguing new arrivals at the door and this year should see at least some of them walk right in.

Bob Dylan’s Label Releases Ultra-Rare Box Set to Exploit Copyright Loophole

dylan(Reprinted from The Guardian)

Only 100 copies of the singer’s new demos compilation were released to prevent the songs entering the public domain

by Sean Michaels

Bob Dylan’s label has made only100 copies of his latest box set. The singer’s new demos compilation, The 50th Anniversary Collection, is apparently designed to exploit a European copyright loophole.

The compilation’s official subtitle says it all: The Copyright Extension Collection, Vol 1. Delivered to a handful of “random” record shops in the UK, Germany, France and Sweden, according to Rolling Stone, the four-CD set comprises 86 songs recorded in 1962 and 1963, around the time of Dylan’s debut album. The packaging is plain, the liner notes almost non-existent. But fans are treating them as the rarities they are; bidding on eBay has topped £650.

According to sources at Sony Music, this compilation isn’t really meant for mass consumption. It’s essentially an attempt to keep these tracks from entering the public domain. Although the European Union has extended copyright terms from 50 years to 70 years, the extension only applies to recordings that have been released during the 50 years after they were made. Sony was therefore forced to release these songs – albeit in limited form – before the end of 2012, when their half-century was up.

“This isn’t a scheme to make money,” a source explained to Rolling Stone. “The whole point of copyrighting [this material] is that we intend to do something with it at some point in the future. But it wasn’t the right time to do it right after [Dylan] released Tempest.”

Perhaps Sony will eventually reissue Dylan’s 1962 debut with a series of outtakes, or collect decades of demos in another box set. Perhaps they just want to thwart the opportunist labels who can now legally sell any unreleased material from before 1963. The only thing that’s certain is that some British, German, French and Swedish Dylan fans got very, very lucky.

Songs You May Have Missed #284

harvest

Barclay James Harvest: “The Iron Maiden” (1970)

From an album that didn’t chart, backed by a tour that was a failure, by a band who never had a big hit. At least tough luck Barclay James Harvest have maintained their sense of humor regarding their 40+ years in the prog rock shadows.

Earning the title of “Poor Man’s Moody Blues”, they actually named a 1977 song “Poor Man’s Moody Blues” and it’s a parody/homage to that band’s classic “Nights in White Satin”.

Previous Older Entries Next Newer Entries