Any Objections to Inducting This Woman into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame?

“I Never Will Marry”

With Johnny Cash

“Long Long Time”

“You’re No Good”

With Andrew “Thank You For Being a Friend” Gold on guitar and the great Jeff “Skunk Baxter” on congas!

“When Will I Be Loved”

____________________

An artist like Linda Ronstadt exposes a significant flaw in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame’s execution of its own concept.

First, one must admit that all judgments of music’s quality are subjective at least to a degree. There are people out there who think the Beatles were rubbish. So no judgment the Rock Hall makes can be backed up by “facts of quality”, only statistics of popularity at best. In short: it can, in the main, only be opinion-based. So the arguments of fans against the inductees the committee select, or for the ones they don’t, have validity because our criteria are the same as the committee’s: opinion. That said, I try to be responsible about my rantings against the Hall, though I do think it’s obscene that the work of The Moody Blues from 1967-72, and that of Chicago from about ’69 to ’75, for example, haven’t been recognized.

But Linda Ronstadt is a different case. She falls through a crack the Hall may want to patch up, though the patch might look a little messy.

Again, recognizing that this can only be an opinion-based argument, I think the following opinion would find a lot of support among those who listened to pop radio forty years ago:

Some of the best popular rock of the 70’s was released under the Linda Ronstadt banner.

She worked the same country-pop musical territory as the Eagles, who were in fact her studio band before they found stardom. Her singles were the equal of theirs in terms of songwriting, performances and production. But notice I didn’t phrase my opinion this way:

Linda Ronstadt belongs in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

That’s an opinion that may or may not have as much support. And it’s clearly not the opinion of the Rock Hall’s committee. Probably because there are two main differences between Ronstadt and Hall inductees like the Eagles–other than levels of cocaine usage of course; they don’t call it the “rock hall” for nothing.

1) The Eagles primarily wrote their own material. Linda Ronstadt performed almost exclusively covers. Hmm. This does have validity with me to a point. In my own mind the Beatles will always be “greater” than Elvis (whatever that means) because they were the best pop songwriters of their generation in addition to what they did as performers and “pop stars”. Kind of like Babe Ruth was greater than Barry Bonds because he could pitch.

But no one held cover versions against Elvis. Or indeed any Motown act. Should it disqualify Ronstadt?

2) Secondly and more to the nub of the matter for me: Linda Ronstadt’s great singles are her best argument for the Hall–not her great stage presence or a groundbreaking style or any musicianship (she didn’t play an instrument). But those great singles were produced by a committee of sorts. As I said, the Eagles played on her early work. Andrew Gold, Waddy Wachtel, Russ Kunkel and some of the same stellar musicians who made Steely Dan records helped make those singles great. Listen again to “You’re No Good” or “When Will I Be Loved”–sometimes a guitar solo or great ensemble playing could be a highlight of a Linda Ronstadt song. It’s odd to say but perhaps true that if the same music had been released under a band name, that band would be in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. But the label on the record said “Linda Ronstadt”. And she was “just a singer in a rock ‘n roll band” to borrow a phrase. But if the “great pop by committee” approach didn’t keep a lot of Motown acts out of the Hall, once again why should it hold Ronstadt back?

So: my opinion is that if there is a museum dedicated to Rock and Roll (a weird idea in the first place) and it encompasses acts that straddle the borders of rock, pop and country (The Mamas and the Papas and Brenda Lee are in) then the great pop music credited to Linda Ronstadt ought to be recognized. And the simplest way to do that is to induct Linda Ronstadt–even if a girl, a microphone and a re-worked song don’t fit your mold as snugly as you may wish.

And I think Three Dog Night should be inducted by precisely the same logic.

I Often Get the Impression the British Don’t “Get” Country Music…

glenn

For example:

“The Genitalia of a Fool” by Glenn Tilbrook

Songs You May Have Missed #292

bread roses

Hoyt Axton: “Boney Fingers” (Live) (1979)

Hoyt Axton wrote more than a few songs popularized by others:

  • “Greenback Dollar” (Kingston Trio)
  • “The Pusher” and “Snowblind Friend” (Steppenwolf)
  • “No-No Song” (Ringo Starr)
  • “Never Been To Spain” and “Joy to the World” (Three Dog Night)

As several of the above songs suggest, Axton didn’t shy from dealing either frankly or humorously with the subject of drug use, with which he was acquainted due to his own cocaine addiction struggles.

Axton was also a familiar face on big and small screen. In addition to roles in nearly 20 movies he appeared on such TV shows as Bonanza, Dukes of Hazzard, I Dream of Jeannie, McCloud, Murder She Wrote, and Growing Pains.

His own live rendition (better than the studio) of his minor hit “Boney Fingers” was a highlight of the Bread & Roses folk festival late in the 70’s.

Gratitude to my late brother Jim for playing this record for me so many years ago.

Songs You May Have Missed #291


blind

Blind Pilot: “Always” (2011)

A few selected words from Amazon.com’s Blind Pilot artist bio:

Portland, Oregon…heartfelt music…folk pop…sincerity…modesty…gorgeously seductive…gentle songs…honest delivery…effortless grace…intimately personal meditations…soaring harmonies…roots-inspired arrangements…

I think that covers it, actually.

See also: https://edcyphers.com/2013/02/16/songs-you-may-have-missed-334/

See also: https://edcyphers.com/2019/05/18/songs-you-may-have-missed-638/

Recommended Albums #36

what the man saidcoming up

Various Artists: Listen to What the Man Said–Popular Artists Pay Tribute to the Music of Paul McCartney (2001)

Various Artists: Coming Up–Independent Artists Pay Tribute to the Music of Paul McCartney (2001)

These were the tribute albums that, more than any other, changed my mind about tribute albums. My thinking as a music consumer had been: if you really love an artist, why would you waste time listening to other artists cover that artist? And other than those made for a charitable cause, why would such albums be worth the money? Aren’t they just a poor man’s version of the original? I mean, the Beatles never recorded trib– oh wait. They kinda did. What were “A Taste of Honey”, “Anna”, “Twist and Shout”, or Lennon’s Rock and Roll album but tributes to artists they admired?

Anyway, I’ve come around about enjoying a reverent–or even an imaginatively different–version of a song I love. But basically it took an extraordinary tribute album–actually a pair of them–to begin that change for me.

Listen to What the Man Said is supposedly “popular” artists’ musical tributes to McCartney. It’s actually a mix of household names (Matthew Sweet, The Finn Brothers) and lesser-knowns (Owsley, The Merrymakers).

Coming Up, described as “independent” artists, is where it gets truly indie, with Kyf Brewer, Cliff Hillis, Phil Keaggy and others, most of whom I’d never heard of before owning this CD. If you’d assume the volume featuring the “popular” artists would be the only one worth having, you’d be wrong. Matthew Sweet and company do a fine job, but the indies are mostly unsung power pop heroes, and imitating the Beatles is what they do. Their hearts are in the project, and they turn in some great performances.

Best example: Cliff Hillis’ take on “This One”, a Flowers in the Dirt album track that, frankly, McCartney didn’t maximize the potential of. It’s rare to hear anyone improve on a Beatle’s version of his own song, but Hillis does so here. In other cases, it’s a fresh energy (Michael Carpenter’s “Getting Closer”) or added harmony layers (Linus of Hollywood’s “Warm and Beautiful”) or meatier guitars (“Maybe I’m Amazed” by Virgos Merlot) or a female lead vocal (“With a Little Luck” by The Masticators) that enable you to hear McCartney’s greatness with fresh ears.

These two CDs are out of print, but still to be found. If you’re a real fan of McCartney’s work, this is music worth owning.

Listen to: “Every Night” (Matthew Sweet)

Listen to: “Band On the Run” (Owsley)

Listen to: “This One” (Cliff Hillis)

Listen to: “Maybe I’m Amazed” (Virgos Merlot)

Listen to: “Getting Closer” (Michael Carpenter)

Listen to: “Somedays” (Phil Keaggy)

Songs You May Have Missed #290

John Denver: “Matthew” (Live) (1975)

Though John Denver’s 1975 live double album An Evening with John Denver spent two weeks at number 2, went triple-platinum and spawned two hit singles, it’s a largely forgotten piece of his catalogue today, with the exception of #1 single “Thank God I’m a Country Boy”. (“Greatest Hits” collections, of which Denver has too many, often make relics of live albums).

But like “Country Boy”, much of this record’s performances actually outdid their original studio versions. Denver put his all into a live album that was a celebration of his rise to the top of the pop music world, backed by a stellar orchestra conducted by Lee Holdridge and such luminaries as Steve Weisberg and Hal Blaine.

The gentle bluegrass ballad “Matthew”, the story of Denver’s real-life uncle, is superior here to its Back Home Again LP version from less than a year earlier. Denver’s voice, one of pop’s sweetest and purest, was perfectly suited to his homespun, optimistic folk-pop, similarly to the way Karen Carpenter’s was a great match to her lovelorn ballad material.

But more than a pleasant voice, Denver was hitting his stride as a singer. His phrasing in this song shows great instincts. He knows to draw out the syllables on lines like “born just south of Colby, Kansas“, while the chorus lines “joy was just the thing that he was raised on, love was just a way to live and die” see him skipping across the short words like a stone across a stream. By alternating similarly throughout the song he both tells his story more credibly and keeps the ear from tiring of one pace of delivery. It’s the subtle genius of a superior singer.

I’ll step onto the soapbox only long enough to say the American Idolization of pop is killing both subtlety and variety in today’s music. With Adele-style belting and Christina Aguilera-style pyrotechnics as primary templates, the singing competitions are the bland tributaries feeding too much of one kind of singing into the mainstream. A young singer today wouldn’t aspire to sing like Karen Carpenter–there’s no one like her on TV to emulate. Neil Young would be laughed off a singing competition show.

John Denver came from a folk music background; young singers today don’t know what folk is. It’s a cliché to say there are no John Denvers anymore. But it’s accurate, I think, to say that pop’s rich diversity isn’t served well by TV singing competition culture.

See also: https://edcyphers.com/2025/04/25/songs-you-may-have-missed-776/

Previous Older Entries Next Newer Entries