Quora: What killed rock music?

(via Quora) Answered by Sean Morrison

What killed rock music?

Success, basically.

For a short period, in the late sixties and early seventies, the recording industry lost control of the music for the first time in history. They literally had NO IDEA what would or wouldn’t sell, and they were dealing with musicians who hadn’t come up through the club circuit, so they didn’t follow the script of previous generations of musicians.

Also, a lot of them wrote their own songs! The Beatles opened the doors to bands and performers having the ability (if they were savvy enough) to control their money, though most got outfoxed on that score.

But for a brief period, performers had a level of power and control that had never existed before. The recording industry was literally throwing money at EVERYBODY and letting them do whatever they wanted, because they had no idea what would or wouldn’t succeed.

So you had an explosion of unfettered creativity. Helped that there was probably the greatest collection of talent that had ever existed in popular music just doing whatever the hell they wanted.

But the first generation got rich, got lazy, got egotistical, and gradually started either running out of ideas or actually dying.

Meanwhile, the industry was starting to figure things out. And you started to see, in the late 70s and early 80s, the evolution of bands specifically designed to fit into the industry’s boxes. The whole concept of “commercial” rock became first a possibility, then a standard. New bands were willing to play the game according to the industry’s rules, and the older acts started opting for commercial success over music as an art form.

And let’s face it…after a decade, the fans started growing up and getting more boring. As Greg Allman of the Allman brothers put it, the same people who had dropped acid in the 60s and wanted an hour of Whipping Post all started doing cocaine in the 80s and wanted all the songs under five minutes!

And once the industry sussed it out, every attempt to bring rock back to its radical roots was quickly quashed and made “acceptable.” So punk quickly went from Television to Blondie. “Alternative” quickly found IT’S way “commercially viable” and so on.

So it goes. At least SOME of us got to live through it and watch it die. Those were good times.

The Legacy of Disco, Decades Later 

(via npr, wamu, 1A)

When you think of “disco,” what comes to mind? Is it the music? Is it the lit-up dance floor? The outfits? Does the word “Revolution” ever come to mind? 

For many, disco music transcended the dance floors of trendy clubs and became the genre of self-expression. But what goes up, must come down. The backlash to the barrage of disco from the music industry forced the genre to evolve. But decades later, new audiences are still reaching to disco for inspiration.

The new PBS docuseries, “Disco: Soundtrack of a Revolution,” airs tomorrow. It dives into the history of the genre and explores the legacy still felt decades later.

Why is the disco era so often dismissed as hedonistic and frivolous, when the genre was embraced by so many?

Bob Dylan Albums Ranked Worst to Best

(via Ultimate Classic Rock) by Michael Gallucci

Not so surprisingly, Bob Dylan’s recording career has lots of ups and downs.

That’s bound to happen when you stick around for more than 50 years and release three dozen albums during that time. As you’ll see in our list of Bob Dylan Albums Ranked Worst to Best, he’s made classic records in almost every single decade since his 1962 self-titled debut.

And more than any other figure in the history of popular music, Dylan has logged more comebacks than we can count on one hand – which date back to the ’60s and go all the way into modern times.

While it’s been an occasional bumpy road for the singer-songwriter, he still managed to influence generations of artists and revolutionize the sound of music – from folk to rock to even gospel – along the way.

For five decades, Dylan has transformed popular music, rode the waves and filtered it all back again. And, along with a select few contemporaries like the Beatles and the Rolling Stones, he’s made some of the most essential listening records in rock history. Like we said, he’s had quite a run, as you’ll see in the below list of Bob Dylan Albums Ranked Worst to Best.

Read More: Bob Dylan Albums Ranked Worst to Best | https://ultimateclassicrock.com/bob-dylan-albums-ranked/?utm_source=tsmclip&utm_medium=referral

Jewel-Box Heroes: Why the CD Revival Is Finally Here

(via Rolling Stone) by Rob Sheffield

In 2021, CD sales increased for the first time in 17 years. That’s mostly because of Adele, whose 2021 album sold 898,000 of those shiny little discs. The last time CDs were this hot, Usher, Ashlee Simpson, and Hoobastank were the ones selling them. Now it’s Adele, BTS, and Taylor Swift. It’s part of an overall revival for physical media — vinyl is booming even bigger. But for those of us who love the humble compact disc, it’s a question worth pondering: Are we finally seeing the CD revival? Why are music fans falling back in love with the gadget that once promised “perfect sound forever”?

Compact discs were never about romance — they were about function. They just worked. They were less glamorous than vinyl, less cool, less tactile, less sexy, less magical. They didn’t have the aura that we fans crave. You didn’t necessarily get sentimental over your CDs, the way you fetishized your scratchy old vinyl, hearing your life story etched into the nicks and crackles. Your copy of Spice World or Life After Death sounded the same as everyone else’s…

Read more: https://getpocket.com/explore/item/jewel-box-heroes-why-the-cd-revival-is-finally-here?utm_source=pocket-newtab-en-us

Beatles Music History, Song by Song

Beware, Beatle fans. This site is a trove of fascinating Fab Four facts and esoterica. Click on a song title and disappear down a rabbit hole. Addictive stuff!

http://www.beatlesebooks.com/uk-albums

Quora: Why were the Beatles so good?

(Answered by W Boutros)

For a variety of reasons, but the short answer is that they had two superbly talented lead singers rather than just one, but much more importantly, both became extraordinarily talented songwriters. John Lennon and Paul McCartney may or may not have become successful on their own. But together they complimented one another’s songwriting talents perfectly, such that they became immeasurably better than they probably would have individually or under different circumstances.

Lennon was more lyrically adventurous, which inspired McCartney to try to match him. Likewise McCartney was more gifted musically, which inspired Lennon to up his game. So in the spirit of friendly competition, Lennon & McCartney spurred each other on and became the most successful songwriting duo in history (by records sold).

That creative fuel in turn inspired George Harrison to excel as a songwriter (who also occasionally sang lead). Harrison’s wonderful vocals also made for impeccable 3-part harmonies with Lennon & McCartney. And Ringo, who also sang lead on a few songs, was the solid backbone they needed to evolve as a cohesive unit. Together they expanded musical boundaries in revolutionary ways, and more quickly than any musical act before or since. They recorded their entire catalogue, including 20 #1 hits (US charts), in only 7 years. That’s a staggering thought when you consider that most modern acts release maybe 3 – 5 albums and perhaps 10 or so singles in that same time-frame. And their hits were just the tip of the iceberg, many people would agree that their albums and album tracks had an even greater impact and lasting influence on pop music.

Put it this way, from the time you first heard of Ed Sheeran (say, 2011) until now – the Beatles would have done what they did, changed the world, and broke up in 2018.

Also, unlike many other acts, the Beatles rarely repeated themselves, which is why listeners didn’t grow tired of them. Beginning roughly around 1965 almost every new release was a radical departure from the prior. They kept pushing boundaries, which is risky, but it paid off. The range of their stylistic diversity is arguably unparalleled for a major pop act.

Another, often overlooked, factor is that they were surrounded by the right people – especially their producer George Martin and manager Brian Epstein. If they hadn’t captured the interest of Epstein (who had never managed a band before) they almost certainly wouldn’t have wound up in the position of being signed to Parlophone by George Martin – who decided to take a chance on them after they were rejected by other labels.

George Martin’s importance cannot be overstated. He was a classically trained musician, yet willing to experiment, so he helped guide the Beatles and turn their often radical ideas into reality. He was crucial to their ever-evolving sound.

Finally they arrived at the right time and place in history to touch a cultural nerve in a way that was virtually unprecedented. Some sociologists theorize that the JFK assassination, which occurred less than 6 months before Beatlemania, created a void or absence of joy (at least in the US) which needed to be filled. In addition to their exciting new sound, their natural charisma and irreverent humor was a refreshing delight to the press and the public. Regardless of the causes, they became a cultural phenomenon that remains unmatched to this day.

It’s not that John, Paul, George and Ringo were the most talented musicians on the planet – it’s the fact that they were in an environment that nurtured and inspired each of them to attain most of their full potential. Or to become self-actualized, to use a psychological term – as individuals, and as a unit.

Many, if not all, human beings have the latent potential to achieve great things, but very few wind up in environments which make that possible. The Beatles were four talented individuals who grew to become extraordinarily talented, and who emerged on the world stage at precisely the right moment. For the Beatles, all the stars happened to align perfectly, and the whole became far greater than the sum of its parts.

Previous Older Entries Next Newer Entries